🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, protest is no longer a fundamental right. Instead, it has become a privilege that authorities grant or withhold at their discretion. This represents the underlying meaning of new regulations that the current government is advancing, which would determine the timing and location demonstrations can take place, with potential imprisonment for those who defy these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Earlier governments had already weakened this essential right: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement extensive new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and unjustified restrictions" on civil liberties. Collectively, these incremental assaults on freedom have practically eliminated the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Using Tragedy to Justify Crackdown

The most recent restrictive measures are being defended by citing last week's terrible antisemitic attack on a Manchester mosque. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, employing this atrocity as a justification to stifle opposition is not only disconnected to that duty but perverts it.

"When you cannot draw the line at mass killing, you probably can't draw the line at democracy," commented a well-known American author, a statement that applies equally for the present administration.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the National Front. Many of these historical demonstrators were branded as radicals in their era, even while they were fighting for the rights of minorities.

Present Situation

In the current complex situation, here's what's actually happening: Israel – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have characterized as genocide. Its warfare have led the International Criminal Court to issue arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

International public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a complete ban on arms sales to the state, and back the arrest of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely failed the argument, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a vile antisemitic crime to try to silence a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be involved in this effort. Ministers have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader crackdown on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to take action.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish identity with the policies of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also harmful. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been rightly challenged for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a point where law enforcement can suggest that protests criticizing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or deliberately" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made organizations "implicated" in supposed mistreatment faced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from 24 months of daily atrocities that have taken many thousands of human lives. British political leaders and media outlets have hardly hidden the limited value they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a dangerous threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused activist collective. Thousands of British protesters have been arrested, primarily for holding signs opposing genocide and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are pensioners; including a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president described such protests as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to control dissent. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears fought, suffered and sacrificed their lives to establish our liberties. We may eventually regret how easily we permitted them to slip away.