🔗 Share this article

Over an extended period, threatening messages persisted. Initially, supposedly from an ex-law enforcement official and an ex-military commander, later from the authorities. In the end, a local artisan claims he was summoned to the police station and told clearly: remain silent or encounter real trouble.

Shaikh is part of a group opposing a high-value redevelopment plan where Dharavi – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – will be razed and redeveloped by a large business group.

"The unique ecosystem of this area is like nowhere else in the globe," explains the protester. "Yet the plan aims to dismantle our community and stop us speaking out."

Opposing Environments

The narrow alleys of the slum sit in stark contrast to the high-rise structures and luxury apartments that overshadow the area. Dwellings are built haphazardly and typically without proper sanitation, informal businesses release harmful emissions and the environment is saturated with the overpowering odor of uncovered waste channels.

Among some individuals, the vision of a renewed Dharavi into a modern district of premium apartments, neat parks, modern retail complexes and residences with multiple bathrooms is an optimistic future realized.

"There's no sufficient health services, roads or sewage systems and there are no spaces for children to play," explains a tea vendor, in his fifties, who migrated from southern India in 1982. "The single option is to clear the area and build us new homes."

Local Protest

Yet certain residents, like Shaikh, are resisting the plan.

None deny that the slum, consistently overlooked as an illegal encroachment, is desperately requiring investment and development. Yet they worry that this initiative – lacking community input – might transform valuable urban land into a playground for the rich, evicting the marginalized, migrant communities who have resided there since the late 1800s.

It was these excluded, relocated individuals who established the uninhabited area into an extensively researched phenomenon of community resilience and commercial output, whose production is valued at between $1m and two million dollars annually, making it one of the world's largest unofficial markets.

Displacement Concerns

Out of about one million inhabitants living in the packed sprawling area, fewer than half will be qualified for alternative accommodation in the project, which is expected to take an extended timeframe to accomplish. The remainder will be relocated to barren areas and salt plains on the distant periphery of the metropolis, threatening to fragment a historic community. Certain individuals will receive no residences at all.

Those allowed to stay in the area will be given units in multi-story structures, a substantial change from the organic, shared lifestyle of dwelling and laboring that has sustained the community for many years.

Businesses from garment work to pottery and recycling are projected to shrink in number and be transferred to an allocated "commercial zone" far from homes.

Livelihood Crisis

In the case of this protester, a leather artisan and long-time inhabitant to reside in Dharavi, the redevelopment presents a fundamental risk. His rickety, three-storey workshop produces apparel – sharp blazers, premium outerwear, fashionable garments – marketed in luxury boutiques in south Mumbai and abroad.

His family lives in the accommodations below and his workers and garment workers – migrants from north India – live there, permitting him to manage costs. Outside Dharavi's enclave, housing costs are often 10 times more expensive for minimal space.

Pressure and Coercion

At the official facilities close by, a conceptual model of the redevelopment plan illustrates a very different outlook. Well-groomed people mill about on two-wheelers and electric vehicles, purchasing continental baked goods and breakfast items and having coffee on a patio outside a coffee shop and dessert parlor. It is a complete departure from the affordable idli sambar first meal and low-cost tea that sustains local residents.

"This represents no improvement for us," states the protester. "It's an enormous real estate deal that will price people out for residents to remain."

There is also distrust of the development company. Run by an influential industrialist – among the country's wealthiest and a supporter of the government head – the conglomerate has encountered allegations of favoritism and questionable practices, which it disputes.

While administrative bodies labels it a joint project, the business group paid a significant amount for its controlling interest. A lawsuit stating that the redevelopment was questionably assigned to the business group is being considered in India's supreme court.

Sustained Harassment

After they started to actively protest the development, protesters and community members state they have been experienced an extended period of harassment and intimidation – comprising messages, direct threats and suggestions that criticizing the project was tantamount to opposing national interests – by individuals they claim work for the business conglomerate.

Among those suspected of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c